Key result
Intermediate CVH scores increase ~38% among Australians with prior CVD, while ideal scores remain unchanged.
Why the study?
Changes in cardiovascular health among adult Australians with prior cardiovascular disease over time had not been examined.
The prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health among Australians with a history of CVD remains low and has not significantly improved over the past decade, highlighting a critical gap in secondary prevention.
Urges intensified secondary prevention in prior CVD; leaves open effective strategies to raise ideal cardiovascular health rates.
BackgroundChanges in cardiovascular health (CVH) in people with previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), including stroke or heart disease may reflect the success of secondary prevention strategies.This has not been examined among adult Australians over time. MethodWe included people aged .18years from National Health Surveys (NHSs) in 2011-2012, 2014-2015, 2017-2018, and 2022 with a self-reported history of stroke or heart disease.At each time point, five items (smoking status, blood pressure [BP], body mass index [BMI], diet and physical activity [PA]) aligned with the American Heart Association's guidelines were scored as 0 "poor", 1 "intermediate", or 2 "ideal".An overall CVH score summing these items for each time point was grouped as poor (scores 0-4), intermediate (5-6), or ideal (7-10).We examined changes in the proportion of people with "ideal" or "intermediate" CVH score, compared to "poor" scores over time using multinomial logistic regression analyses reporting the risk ratio (RR 95% confidence interval [CI]) for years 2014-2015, 2017-2018, and 2022 compared to 2011-2012, adjusting for covariates (sex, age, socioeconomic status, marital status, education, and occupation). ResultsThere were n=78,071 across the NHSs with 6%-7% (n=4,192) having a history of stroke or heart disease and included in the analysis.There was no change in the proportion with an "ideal" CVH score over the four surveys, but an increase in the likelihood of having an intermediate score, compared to a poor score in 2022, and compared to reference survey period (2011-2012) (RR adjusted 1.38; 95% CI 1.06-1.81). ConclusionsIdeal CVH prevalence remained and did not change significantly over time in people with a history of CVD.There is an urgent need for better secondary management efforts to manage risk factors and reduce recurrent CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rehman et al. (2026) studied this question. Ideal cardiovascular health prevalence remained unchanged among Australians with prior cardiovascular disease from 2011 to 2022, but the likelihood of intermediate scores increased (RR 1.38).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: