PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026BMC Oral Health3 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic value of NLR versus PLR and LMR in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

JXJian XuFWFan WuYJYuhuang Jiang

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to determine the prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers NLR, PLR, and LMR in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
  • Evaluated studies published until February 1, 2026.
  • Included 35 retrospective studies with 12,225 OSCC patients.
  • Analyzed hazard ratios for overall survival and disease-free survival using random- or fixed-effect models.
  • Conducted cumulative meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis for evidence stability.
  • Performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess heterogeneity.
  • High pretreatment NLR was linked to poorer overall survival (HR = 1.61) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.64).
  • High PLR showed association with poor overall survival but with marked heterogeneity.
  • LMR did not show statistical significance for overall survival.
  • NLR emerges as a reliable prognostic biomarker for OSCC.

Abstract

The prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers like neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) requires further validation. This updated meta-analysis evaluates the impact of these biomarkers on OSCC survival and aims to identify the most effective indicator. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science until February 1, 2026. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using random- or fixed-effects models. Evidence stability was assessed through cumulative meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA), while restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis measured survival differences between NLR subgroups. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine heterogeneity and robustness. Out of 1,193 articles, 35 retrospective studies involving 12,225 OSCC patients were included. High pretreatment NLR was significantly associated to poorer OS (HR = 1.61) and DFS (HR = 1.64), confirmed by sufficient cumulative information size in TSA. While high PLR was associated with poor OS, the results showed marked heterogeneity and instability. LMR did not reach statistical significance for OS, confirmed by sufficient evidence in TSA. Current evidence suggests that NLR is a robust prognostic biomarker for OSCC. Given the observational nature of the included studies, future prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings and establish standardized NLR thresholds to guide risk stratification and personalized management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9212496e729e6297f515https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08098-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper