PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Discover Civil Engineering2 citationsOpen Access

Real-time computer vision for safety and efficiency in smart infrastructure

ABAhmed BelloAAAkinyemi Sadeeq AkintolaRARachel Israel Abasiama

Key Points

  • This review aims to summarize the effectiveness of real-time computer vision in enhancing safety and efficiency in smart infrastructure.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Searched five bibliographic databases for relevant studies from 2015 to 2025.
  • Included nineteen field-validated studies that met eligibility criteria.
  • Identified safety gains that reduce the time from event detection to intervention.
  • Highlighted efficiency gains that enhance throughput and energy performance.
  • Proposed a unified implementation framework to improve reporting and comparability across studies.

Abstract

This systematic review summarises the current state of real-time computer vision practice for smart infrastructure, and compiles evidence on efficiency and safety outcomes. In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we preregistered a protocol and conducted a search of five bibliographic databases for studies published between January 2015 and 24 September 2025. Nineteen field-validated studies met the eligibility criteria. Across the wastewater, buildings, structural assets domains and ports, transport, two recurring value streams were observed: (i) safety gains that shorten the event-to-intervention interval (e.g. detection of trespassing or incidents, vision-based metrology for displacement or vehicle load, and proximity risk cues), and (ii) efficiency gains that improve throughput, energy performance or process stability (e.g. demand-responsive building control, station and intersection analytics, wastewater foam segmentation and digital twin–linked crane operations). Most systems use technical solutions such as semantic segmentation for state/surface estimation, detector–tracker pipelines, or vision-based metrology, edge-cloud, implemented via edge-first, edge–cloud, or on-premises/platform-integrated deployments. However, cross-study comparability remains limited because many papers do not consistently report sustained throughput (FPS), end-to-end latency, network/hardware context and energy consumption. To address this, we present a unified implementation and governance framework, along with a reporting checklist. This framework ties model accuracy to operational decision pathways, access/privacy controls and real-time constraints, and lifecycle monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bello et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9212496e729e6297f5f6https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-026-00457-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Advances in computer vision for comprehensive railway engineering: from track inspection to rolling stock and safety monitoring2026 · 3 citations
  2. 2The Impacts of computer vision technology in construction: investigating applications and challenges2024
  3. 3From Perception to Cognition: A Systematic Review of Informatics-Driven Vision-Based Safety Management for Sustainable Development in High-Risk Industries2026
  4. 4Systematic Review of Computer-Vision Technologies for Personal Protective Equipment Compliance Monitoring2026
  5. 5Computer Vision Based Traffic Monitoring System2024 · 1 citations