Systematic review assesses TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 accuracy for acute kidney injury in ICU patients, suggesting implications for clinical practice.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in hospitalized patients, particularly those admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), which leads to high rates of morbidity and mortality. Under these conditions, tissue inhibitor metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) have been identified as potential biomarkers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the TIMP2/IGFBP7 biomarkers for AKI in ICU patients, using data retrieved from PubMed, Embase, LILACS, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We use the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) to assess quality. We identified 2,530 publications and seven articles were included in this review, comprising a total of 2,676 participants. The overall summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analysis demonstrated good diagnostic performance (AUC=0.824), with a pooled sensitivity of 0.572 (95 % CI, 0.54–0.77) and specificity of 0.27 (95 % CI, 0.18–0.37). When analyzed by cut-off values, the 0.3 (ng/mL) 2 /1,000 threshold yielded higher sensitivity [0.815 (0.711–0.888)] but lower specificity [0.543 (0.500–0.585)], while the 2.0 (ng/mL) 2 /1,000 threshold showed the opposite pattern, with lower sensitivity [0.548 (0.384–0.702)] and higher specificity [0.838 (0.751–0.898)]. Heterogeneity was moderate to high (I 2 =69.8–79 %), partially explained by cut-off variation. The 0.3 cut-off demonstrated high sensitivity, whereas the 2.0 cut-off showed greater specificity. These results suggest that, clinically, a lower cut-off supports earlier AKI detection and reduces missed cases in critically ill patients, whereas a higher cut-off may be more appropriate when minimizing unnecessary interventions and resource utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Comiz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: