This system detects cheating in online exams using a new explainable neuro-symbolic framework, suggesting improved reliability and integrity in assessments.
With the proliferation of online examination systems, protecting academic integrity and reliably detecting cheating have become significant research problems. Current AI-based online monitoring systems can achieve high accuracy by analyzing visual behavioral cues; however, their often black-box nature limits their explainability, reliability, and legal compliance (e.g., GDPR). In contrast, while rule-based approaches are interpretable, they are insufficient for generalizing complex and ambiguous human behaviors. This study proposes an explainable neuro-symbolic framework combining data-driven learning with symbolic reasoning for cheating detection in online exams. The proposed framework comprises three main layers: a neural perceptron layer that generates a suspicious behavior score; a symbolic reasoning layer comprising ANFIS and ILP methods to increase explainability and manage ambiguity; and a neuro-symbolic fusion layer that integrates these two layers. The success of the proposed framework for plagiarism detection was evaluated using a dataset containing visual–behavioral features such as gaze behavior, head pose, hand-object interaction, and device usage, along with the XGBoost method at the neural perceptron layer. Experimental results show that the proposed approach achieves high detection success and supports decision-making using logical rules, thereby reducing false positives. In this respect, the study offers an ethical, transparent, and reliable solution for online exam security.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özseven et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: