This analysis evaluates scenario reliability for CVaR minimisation in financial decision-making contexts, indicating its importance.
Reliable scenarios are needed to obtain a high-quality solution to a stochastic program. Considering sets of scenarios and corresponding observed values of the uncertain parameters over a collection of historical instances, reliability is defined loosely as goodness of the scenarios' fit to the observations. For two-stage, risk-neutral models, a statistical tool was developed previously to assess the reliability of any given scenario generation method. This tool can diagnose over- or under-dispersion and/or bias in the scenario sets. For risk-averse decision makers who aim to minimise conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), only the scenarios that define the upper tail of the optimal cost distribution at the optimal solution are important. We develop a tool to assess the reliability of these so-called effective scenarios for CVaR minimisation. Simulation studies of a financial investment problem demonstrate the ability of the tool to detect mismatches in mean, variance, or kurtosis between scenarios and the corresponding observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: