Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey assesses patient awareness and trust in AI decision support tools in a safety-net healthcare setting, indicating the need for transparency.
Objectives To assess patient awareness, trust, perceived benefits, and risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical care within an urban safety-net health system. Materials and Methods We surveyed 313 patients from November 2024 to January 2025 regarding AI awareness, trust in AI-assisted decision-making, and preferences for transparency and oversight. Quantitative analyses assessed associations between AI awareness and perceived benefit; qualitative analysis identified themes influencing trust. Results While 84% were familiar with commercial AI, fewer than half recognized the use of AI in medical decision support. Greater AI awareness was associated with higher perceived benefit (all P < .001). Participants emphasized transparency (92%), clinician oversight (82%), and validation as critical to trust. Discussion This study provides one of the first assessments of patient perspectives on AI within a safety-net healthcare setting. Patients view clinical AI favorably but demand transparency and clinician involvement. Conclusions Patient education and engagement are essential for equitable, trustworthy AI deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phelps et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: