Retrospective analysis shows that major pathologic response predicts better survival in pancreatic cancer, indicating personalized treatment options.
Objective: We evaluated the prognostic significance and implications of a major pathologic response (MPR) after preoperative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Summary Background Data: Preoperative treatment is increasingly used for PDAC to improve oncologic outcomes. The pathologic response represents a potential indicator of treatment efficacy; however, its prognostic value in PDAC remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 739 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC after preoperative treatment at 21 institutions in Japan. The pathologic response was graded using Evans’ classification, with MPR defined as Evans grade III/IV. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors were evaluated, and factors associated with achieving MPR were analyzed to develop a predictive model. Results: MPR was achieved in 11.5% of patients. The MPR group had a significantly longer median overall survival (71.5 vs. 40.9 mo) and recurrence-free survival (55.5 vs. 15.2 mo) than the non-MPR group. Multivariate analysis identified MPR as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. In the MPR subgroup, neither overall nor recurrence-free survival differed according to adjuvant chemotherapy administration; multivariate analysis did not identify adjuvant therapy as an independent prognostic factor. Predictive factors for achieving MPR included chemoradiotherapy, preoperative duration ≥6 months, normal carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after preoperative treatment, and complete or partial radiologic response. Finally, we developed a simplified predictive model for achieving MPR. Conclusions: MPR was independently associated with favorable survival in PDAC. The prognostic impact of adjuvant chemotherapy was not observed among patients who achieved MPR, suggesting that MPR may inform individualized postoperative management and warrants prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamane et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: