Pilot study evaluates mG8 tool's ability to predict complications and mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy, suggesting its potential clinical utility.
To evaluate whether the modified G8 (mG8) screening tool predicts severe postoperative complications and 90-day mortality in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). We performed a single centre retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent RARC with ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder diversion between 2011 and 2020 at a tertiary centre. Preoperative frailty was assessed using the mG8 score. Severe complications were defined as Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 3. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of the mG8 score with severe complications and 90-day mortality. A total of 155 patients were included. The median age was 69 years, and 49 patients (31.6%) had an impaired mG8 score (≥ 6). Severe complications occurred in 67 patients (43.2%), and 90-day mortality occurred in 10 patients (6.5%). In univariable analysis, an impaired mG8 score was significantly associated with severe complications (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.46–5.93, p = 0.002). After adjusting for age group, the mG8 score remained an independent predictor (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.29–5.45, p = 0.008). An impaired mG8 score was also associated with increased 90-day mortality (OR 5.72, 95% CI 1.46–22.81, p = 0.015). Age ≥ 76 years predicted higher mortality in univariable analysis but was not associated with severe complications in adjusted models. The mG8 screening tool is a promising predictor of major postoperative complications and 90-day mortality following RARC. Frailty, rather than chronological age or comorbidity burden, appears to better identify high-risk patients. Prospective multicentre studies are warranted to validate the role of the mG8 score in preoperative risk stratification for radical cystectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alhamdani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: