Two studies assess the best way to measure relationship instability, suggesting an effective single-item method.
Participant reports of romantic relationship instability are of central interest in relationship science. However, this construct is inconsistently measured, with different response options and items presented. Across two studies, we assessed the psychometric properties of a 6-item scale of relationship instability based on a 2- or 5-response option (RO) format ( N Study 1 = 853; N Study 2 = 1,007). We also examined the psychometric properties of each item to identify a strong single-item measure of relationship instability. In both studies, mean differences in item scores, total scores, reliability, and response time based on response option set were present, and data from the 5-RO condition displayed greater variability. A single-item assessment with strong psychometric qualities and minimal reductions in convergent validity is recommended for future use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: