PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Sustainability2 citationsOpen Access

A Systematic Review of the Trajectory of Urban Resilience Research: A Bibliometric Perspective on Global Trends and China’s Pathway

View Full Paper
MHMeng HanGFGui FuZWZhirong Wu

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine the evolution and current trends in urban resilience research, with a focus on China’s developments.
  • Conducted bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace and VOSviewer tools.
  • Analyzed 8727 documents from 2000 to 2024 from the Web of Science Core Collection.
  • Identified and categorized research phases in urban resilience.
  • Resilient city discourse has shifted from engineering to a multidimensional approach.
  • Identified three phases of evolution in urban resilience research: theoretical foundations, technological integration, and crisis response.
  • China adopts a dual-track approach combining policy initiatives and localized innovations.

Abstract

This study employs bibliometric analysis, utilizing the visualization tools CiteSpace 6.3.R1 and VOSviewer 1.6.18, to systematically examine 8727 documents from the Web of Science Core Collection (2000–2024) related to “resilient cities” and “urban resilience.” It explores the evolution of resilient city research, current international trends, practical developments in China, and future directions. The study addresses key questions concerning the theoretical foundations of resilient cities, research advances in the security field, China’s implementation pathways, and emerging trends. Findings indicate that resilient city discourse has evolved from a narrow focus on engineering-based disaster prevention toward a multidimensional, socio-ecological–economic adaptive system. This progression can be divided into three phases: the theoretical foundation period (2000–2008), the technological integration period (2009–2018), and the complex crisis response period (2019–present). Internationally, practices are increasingly centered on climate change adaptation, supported by multi-level governance frameworks such as the MCR2030 initiative. China demonstrates a “dual-track” approach that combines policy-driven initiatives with localized innovations, advancing through international pilot projects, domestic policy experimentation, and grassroots exploration. The study also highlights differences between Chinese and Western research in perspectives, methodologies, and theoretical frameworks. Future resilient city development is expected to emphasize systematization, digitalization, and equity, leveraging technologies such as digital twins and artificial intelligence while fostering community participation and multi-scale collaborative governance. By systematically outlining the theoretical evolution and practical logic of resilient cities, this study offers insights for urban resilience building in developing countries and provides a methodological reference for enhancing resilience capabilities across different administrative levels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Han et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb929b496e729e6298012chttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18062945
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper