Cross-sectional study evaluates advanced MRI sequences for structural lesion detection in pediatric sacroiliitis, highlighting potential for routine use.
Background/Objectives: Assessing structural damage in pediatric sacroiliitis is challenging, necessitating radiation-free alternatives to computed tomography (CT). This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of advanced MRI sequences—3D-MENSA (Multi-Echo in Steady-State Acquisition), 3D-MERGE (Multiple-Echo Recombined Gradient Echo), and Zero Echo Time (ZTE)—against conventional T1-weighted sequences for detecting structural lesions. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) served as the reference standard. A secondary objective was to qualitatively assess the visibility of active inflammatory lesions and fat metaplasia. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 23 pediatric patients with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) were included. To adhere strictly to radiation safety principles, the study used pre-existing ldCT datasets from a clinical cohort as the reference standard. No new CT scans were performed for this study. Structural lesions (erosions, sclerosis, and joint-space changes) were independently scored by two blinded radiologists. Interobserver agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: Advanced sequences (ZTE, 3D-MENSA, 3D-MERGE) demonstrated high agreement with ldCT for erosion detection (ICC range: 0.924–0.998) and significantly outperformed conventional T1-weighted MRI (ICC: 0.707). 3D-MENSA provided distinct contrast, effectively differentiating the ligamentous component of the sacroiliac joint from both the synovial component and the adjacent bone cortex. Qualitatively, 3D-MENSA also identified bone marrow edema and fat metaplasia, which cannot be visualized by ZTE or ldCT. Conclusions: 3D-MENSA and 3D-MERGE enable comprehensive evaluation of structural sacroiliitis lesions in pediatric patients with diagnostic accuracy comparable to ldCT. Specifically, 3D-MENSA demonstrates the potential to detect both active and chronic lesions in a single, rapid, radiation-free acquisition. These findings suggest that it should be considered for routine pediatric imaging protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: