Open-access tool predicts soil sorption properties, improving chemical assessments and regulatory frameworks.
The soil organic carbon–water partition coefficient (KOC) is a key determinant of the environmental mobility and persistence of organic contaminants. Experimental measurement of KOC is accurate but resource-intensive, limiting its availability for the vast chemical inventory in commerce. Here, we developed interpretable quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) and quantitative Read-Across Structure–Activity Relationship (q-RASAR) models, along with machine learning (ML) approaches, to predict log KOC values using reproducible 1D and 2D molecular descriptors. The optimized multiple linear regression (MLR)-based QSAR model, built on 824 structurally diverse compounds and nine mechanistically relevant descriptors, achieved strong internal and external performance (R2 = 0.85, Q2LOO = 0.84, and Q2F1 = 0.84). Comparative statistical evaluation using paired t- and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed that the QSAR model significantly outperformed the q-RASAR variant (p < 0.05) in predictive accuracy and robustness. Mechanistic interpretation revealed that hydrophobicity, aromatic rigidity, and halogenation increase soil sorption, whereas polar or phosphorus-rich substituents promote mobility. Large-scale external screening of 7,612 chemicals from the U.S. EPA’s CPDat inventory showed 94% coverage within the applicability domain (AD), supporting data gap filling under regulatory frameworks. An open-access web tool, KOC-WebPredictor, was developed to deliver quantitative (QSAR-based) and qualitative (ML-based) predictions, with visualization taking AD into consideration. This integrated, interpretable platform provides a practical alternative to experimental assays for assessing soil–organic carbon interactions and prioritizing chemicals based on mobility potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: