This study investigates the utilization of Abies alba exudate resin for the development of hybrid resins intended as matrices for composite materials. The novelty of this work lies in demonstrating that physically hybridized, bio-derived resin systems based on Abies alba exudate can exhibit distinct mechanical and dynamic behaviors solely by adjusting the solvent-assisted formulation route, without intentional chemical modification and without spectroscopic evidence of co-network formation within the limits of ATR-FTIR analysis, although limited interfacial interactions cannot be excluded. Two formulation routes were explored: (i) dilution of Abies alba exudate in turpentine derived from pine buds, (ii) dilution in ethanol (96%). The diluted resins were subsequently blended with a commercial epoxy system, which was cured with its amine hardener to form solid matrices in which the Abies alba component was physically incorporated. The resulting hybrid resins were characterized by multiple testing methods and further applied in the fabrication of cotton fiber-reinforced composites. The turpentine-based hybrid resin (HR1) showed a rigid mechanical response, with tensile strengths of approximately 13.2–13.5 MPa, compressive strengths of about 30 MPa, Shore D hardness values of 56–58.5, and a low damping ratio (≈0.026). In contrast, the ethanol-based hybrid resin (HR2) exhibited a highly deformable mechanical response, characterized by low tensile strength (≈0.5 MPa), very high elastic recovery, low hardness (<10 Shore D), and a significantly higher damping ratio (≈0.139). To demonstrate their applicability in composite manufacturing, the HR1 matrix was reinforced with cotton fabric, leading to a substantial improvement in tensile strength (25–26 MPa) and flexural strength (35–36 MPa), together with an increased natural frequency. Water absorption tests revealed limited moisture uptake for the neat hybrid resins (≤0.04 g), while the cotton-reinforced composite exhibited higher but largely reversible water absorption (≈21.5%), associated with the hydrophilic nature of the reinforcement.
Mirițoiu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.