This manuscript examines procedural transformations in accountability and responsibility related to generative AI in decision-making environments, indicating new governance approaches.
This manuscript is a preprint and has not undergone peer review. It examines how the institutional integration of generative AI, particularly large language models, reconfigures the procedural architecture of responsibility in hybrid decision-making environments. Drawing on responsible innovation theory, the article argues that the central transformation is procedural: epistemic labour is redistributed, justificatory narratives are co-produced within hybrid infrastructures, and the pathways through which accountability is assigned become reconfigured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: