Cross-sectional analysis identifies factors affecting recovery time in hemodialysis patients, suggesting improved care strategies.
Objectives: Hemodialysis is essential for patients with end-stage kidney disease, yet the post-treatment recovery period – dialysis recovery time (DRT) – is a significant determinant of quality of life. In India, where chronic kidney disease is prevalent, understanding the factors influencing DRT can aid in developing strategies to improve patient outcomes. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study examined 160 adult patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in Mumbai across multiple centers. We assessed various demographic, clinical, and dialysis-related factors to determine their impact on DRT. Data collection included demographic profiles, comorbidities, dialysis parameters (e.g., frequency and ultrafiltration rate), and laboratory values (hemoglobin, albumin, and electrolyte levels). DRT was measured using a simple health-related quality of life question: “How long does it take you to recover from a dialysis session? and then categorized into three groups: Less than 2 h, 2–6 h, and more than 6 h. Results: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), anemia, and higher ultrafiltration volumes significantly extend DRT. Specifically, T2DM patients were three times more likely to experience prolonged recovery. Unemployed patients were also found to have increased recovery times as compared to others. In addition, greater interdialytic weight gain and aggressive ultrafiltration correlated with extended recovery, likely due to fluid imbalance and cardiovascular strain. Conclusion: The study underscores the need for tailored care strategies, such as optimized fluid management, anemia treatment, and nutritional support, to mitigate post-dialysis fatigue and improve recovery. These findings offer valuable insights for clinicians aiming to enhance patient-centered dialysis care and reduce DRT, potentially improving adherence and long-term health outcomes for Indian hemodialysis patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhuwania et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: