PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026International Journal of Energy Studies0 citations

A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD

TİTuğçe İnağYİYasin İnağ

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effect of two decomposition strategies on forecasting accuracy for wind speed time series.
  • Applied VMD and LMD decomposition on wind speed data.
  • Used LSTM networks to forecast each decomposed component.
  • Trained a benchmark LSTM model on raw data for comparison.
  • Performed statistical validation using the Diebold–Mariano test.
  • Hybrid models significantly enhanced forecasting accuracy compared to the benchmark LSTM.
  • VMD approach achieved the lowest prediction error and showed greater robustness than LMD.
  • Performance differences were statistically significant at the 1% level.

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of data preprocessing techniques in improving the forecasting performance of highly volatile time series. Although prior studies predominantly emphasize complex hybrid model architectures or extensive hyperparameter optimization, the isolated effect of the mathematical foundations of decomposition methods on prediction accuracy remains relatively underexplored. To address this issue, two fundamentally different decomposition techniques—Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), which follows a variational optimization framework, and Local Mean Decomposition (LMD), which is based on an iterative scheme—are comparatively applied to nonlinear and highly fluctuating wind speed time series. Following decomposition, each extracted component is forecast individually and subsequently reconstructed using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. In addition, an LSTM model trained directly on raw data is employed as a benchmark to assess the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid approaches. The experimental results demonstrate that incorporating a preprocessing stage substantially enhances forecasting accuracy. Both hybrid models outperform the baseline LSTM model in terms of prediction error metrics. Among them, the VMD-based approach yields the lowest error values and exhibits superior robustness and stability when compared with the LMD-based model. The statistical significance of the observed performance differences is further validated through the Diebold–Mariano test, confirming the dominance of the proposed VMD–LSTM framework at the 1% significance level (p 0.01). Overall, the findings underline the critical importance of data preprocessing in forecasting tasks involving highly noisy and volatile time series and indicate that variational-based decomposition offers notable advantages in terms of stability and reproducibility over iterative methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

İnağ et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9321496e729e62980faahttps://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1847604
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A new two-stage decomposition and integrated hybrid model for short-term wind speed prediction2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Performance analysis of ARIMA Model for wind speed forecasting in Jerusalem, Palestine2024 · 26 citations
  3. 3Improved LMD and Its Application in Short-Term Wind Power Forecast2014 · 1 citations
  4. 4A novel two-stage data-driven model for ultra-short-term wind speed prediction2022 · 14 citations
  5. 5An EMD-recursive ARIMA method to predict wind speed for railway strong wind warning system2015 · 168 citations