Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Finite-element analysis compares strength and repairability of welded, bolted, and replaceable-fuse connections, indicating trade-offs among designs.
Beam-to-column connections govern both seismic performance and post-earthquake repairability of steel moment-resisting frames. Yet direct, apples-to-apples comparisons among welded, bolted, and repair-oriented replaceable-fuse moment connections are still scarce, which hinders rational selection for resilient construction. This study conducts a unified finite-element comparison of three representative joint archetypes—W-RBS, Bolted, and Prefab-web-fuse—under monotonic and cyclic loading. Consistent moment-rotation definitions are adopted, and normalized indices are introduced to compare hysteresis shape, degradation, and energy dissipation across joint concepts with different strength scales. Component-wise plastic dissipation is also extracted to quantify damage localization and assess main-frame protection and replaceability. Results reveal clear trade-offs: W-RBS provides the highest strength and dissipation but degrades most in stiffness; the bolted joint shows pinching due to interface compliance; and the web-fuse concept concentrates inelastic demand in a replaceable segment, supporting repairability-oriented design. The proposed framework offers mechanism-based guidance for selecting steel moment connections toward resilient and repairable frames.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: