PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)2 citations

Current practices and harmonization challenges in Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers: an EFLM Committee: Harmonization Survey

View Full Paper
LALuisa AgnelloLDLora DukićLALeila Akvlediani

Key Points

  • The survey aims to evaluate current laboratory practices for Alzheimer’s disease biomarker testing and identify harmonization challenges.
  • Conducted an online survey distributed to EFLM committee members.
  • The questionnaire focused on pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical practices for CSF and blood-based biomarkers.
  • Analyzed responses using descriptive statistics.
  • Collected 316 responses from over 35 countries.
  • Cerebrospinal fluid remains the primary sample for AD diagnosis, with increasing use of blood-based biomarkers.
  • Significant variability was found in sample handling, assay platforms, biomarker panels, and cut-off values.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Fluid biomarkers are central to the biological definition and diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Despite international recommendations, substantial variability persists in laboratory practices. This survey, promoted by the Committee: Harmonisation (C:H) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM), aimed to assess real-world laboratory practices for AD biomarker testing. Methods An online survey was distributed to EFLM members. The questionnaire addressed pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical practices for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood-based AD biomarkers. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results A total of 316 responses from more than 35 countries were collected. CSF remained the primary matrix for AD diagnostics, although blood-based biomarkers were increasingly implemented. Marked heterogeneity was observed across all phases of testing, including sample handling, assay platforms, biomarker panels, and decisional cut-offs. Cut-off values for core biomarkers varied widely, as well as harmonization of reporting unit and the adoption of SI units preventing a shared approach to interpreting the results. Conclusions Despite growing clinical adoption, AD biomarker testing remains highly heterogeneous. Coordinated international harmonization of pre-analytical procedures, analytical methods, and post-analytical interpretation, particularly for blood-based biomarkers, is urgently required to ensure reliable and comparable results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Agnello et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9336496e729e6298119chttps://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Toward harmonized reporting of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in clinical practice2026
  2. 2Pre‐analytical guidelines for blood and CSF Biomarkers 2025: Recommendations from the NACC ADRC Biofluid Biomarker Best Practices Workgroup2026 · 4 citations
  3. 3Evidence‐based standardized sample handling protocol for accurate blood‐based Alzheimer's disease biomarker measurement: Results and consensus of the Global Biomarker Standardization Consortium2025 · 25 citations
  4. 4Ethical considerations of fluid biomarker use in alzheimer’s disease - a rapid review2026
  5. 5Benchmarking of a multi-biomarker low-volume panel for Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementia research2024 · 9 citations