Analytical cohort study identifies vital signs subphenotypes predicting 30-day mortality in suspected infection patients, indicating the need for timely intervention.
Background/Objectives: To determine and validate the cluster trajectory model by dynamic subphenotypes of vital signs in infecti ons and prediction of 30-day mortality. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in the emergency department of Clínica Colombia with patients with suspected infection. Clinical data, vital signs, and 30-day mortality were collected. Vital signs were measured within the first 24 h of admission, and patients were classified according to a vital signs trajectory model into four groups: A, B, C, and D. Results: The final cohort consisted of 625 patients, and the subphenotypes, according to the vital signs, were as follows: A—2.66% (all vital signs altered), B—9.2% (at least one alteration, predominantly hypertension), C—19% (minimal or no alteration, control), D—69.2% (only arterial hypotension). The primary outcome was mortality. Overall mortality was 8.6%, being higher in group A followed by D, B and C (p = 0.009). The risk increased progressively in groups B (OR = 2.87, CI 95%: 0.62–13.25), D (OR = 4.77, CI 95%: 1.46–15.58), and A (OR = 8.33, CI 95%: 1.54–45.05). Group A presented more frequently with pneumonia (p = 0.002), CNS infections (p = 0.021), mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), and vasopressor support (p < 0.001). Significant differences among groups were found in leukocytosis (B vs. C p = 0.026), neutrophilia (B vs. C p = 0.001 and B vs. D p = 0.042), lymphocytosis (B vs. D p = 0.002), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (A vs. C p = 0. 010), lactate (C vs. D p = 0.044), anemia (B vs. D p = 0.013 and C vs. D p = 0.001), and CRP (A vs. C p = 0.004, B vs. C p < 0.001 and C vs. D p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with suspected infection and more altered vital signs have higher mortality (group A) and benefit from earlier interventions by sepsis teams in the emergency department.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patiño-Moncayo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: