Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multi-centered study examines success rates of pessary self-management in women with pelvic organ prolapse, suggesting factors influencing effectiveness.
The objective was to determine the success rate of pessary self-management (PSM) and identify influencing factors among the Hong Kong Chinese population with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). A prospective study was conducted from November 2023 to April 2024 across three local tertiary hospitals. A total of 165 Chinese women with POP using a ring pessary were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included dependency, limited dexterity, and cognitive impairment. Participants received a standardized one-to-one PSM teaching session. Success was defined as continuing PSM at the 1-year follow-up. Statistical analysis identified factors associated with success. The PSM success rate was 86.7% (143 out of 165). The successful group was significantly younger (mean 68.7 vs 73.9 years, p = 0.011), had higher education levels (p = 0.023), with lower parity (median 2 vs 3, p = 0.048), and less advanced stages of POP (88% stages 1–2 vs 54.5%, p < 0.001). Contrary to initial hypotheses, successful PSM was associated with the use of a larger pessary (69.8 mm vs 66.6 mm, p = 0.047). PSM is a highly viable and successful strategy for Chinese women, with a success rate comparable with Western populations. Key factors for success include younger age, higher education, milder prolapse, and the use of a larger pessary. These findings support the early introduction of PSM to suitable patients to enhance patient empowerment and optimize conservative POP management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: