PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Sustainability2 citationsOpen Access

Pathways to Green AI: Information Disclosure of Artificial Intelligence Within the ESG Framework of Commercial Entities

View Full Paper
JCJunkai Chen

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the current state of AI information disclosure within ESG reports and propose improvements.
  • Analyzed ESG reports of listed companies from the US, Europe, and China.
  • Examined disclosure levels across development, application, manufacturing, and consumption domains.
  • Utilized empirical analysis to explore ESG-AI disclosure framework.
  • ESG reports are primary channels for AI-related information disclosure.
  • Notable disparities in disclosure levels across key AI domains were identified.
  • Governance (G) pillar shows the highest density of AI-related information compared to Environmental (E) and Social (S) dimensions.

Abstract

Strengthening transparency has emerged as a pivotal issue in promoting the responsible development of artificial intelligence (AI). As the prevailing framework for corporate information disclosure, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting shares an inherent synergy with AI governance; both are rooted in the pursuit of sustainable development and the disclosure of specific matters to investors and broader stakeholders. This study analyzes the status of artificial intelligence (AI) information disclosure in the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reports of listed companies across the United States, Europe, and China, finding that: (1) ESG reports have emerged as a primary channel for business organizations to disclose AI-related information; (2) significant disparities exist in disclosure levels across four key AI-related domains—development, application, manufacturing, and consumption; and (3) disclosure density varies considerably across E, S, and G dimensions, with the Governance (G) pillar exhibiting the most comprehensive information. Based on an empirical analysis of the ESG-AI disclosure framework, this study proposes an optimization scheme for ESG-AI reporting, clearly defining mandatory ESG-AI disclosure obligations for listed companies and employing the “comply or explain” mechanism to balance corporate transparency with operational efficiency while adhering to the “Double Materiality” principle by disclosing model training energy consumption and ecological impacts under Environmental (E) matters, addressing employment, employee training, marketing labeling, and customer privacy under Social (S) matters, and elaborating on corporate AI strategies, risk management protocols, and governance policies under Governance (G) matters. Regarding procedural safeguards, taking China as a case study, centralized disclosure could be implemented through the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, complemented by an assurance system for listed company reports to enhance the accessibility and accuracy of information disclosure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Junkai Chen (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb938e496e729e62981842https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062922
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper