Randomised control trial evaluates atropine's impact on myopia progression in young children, suggesting trends in efficacy.
Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of atropine 0.01% in young premyopic and low-myopic children. Methods Children (5–9 years old) with premyopia (spherical equivalent refraction, SER+1.00 to −0.49D, n 156) or low myopia (SER −0.50 to −1.50D, n 52), with at least 1 parent with myopia <−3.00D, were randomised to receive placebo or atropine 0.01% eye-drops in a 1:1 ratio. Cycloplegic autorefraction and axial length were measured every 6 months over 2 years. Results Mean baseline SER was +0.5+/−0.04D in premyopia and −1.00±0.06D in the low-myopia eyes. Progression over 2 years in premyopic eyes was −0.96±0.10D vs −0.82±0.10D (p=0.328), or 0.72±0.03 mm vs 0.63±0.04 mm (p=0.161) in the placebo and atropine groups, respectively. Progression in eyes remaining emmetropic was −0.43±0.37D vs −0.29±0.37D (p=0.007) or 0.49±0.22 mm vs 0.41±0.38 mm (p=0.209) in the placebo versus atropine-treated eyes, respectively; while eyes which became myopic progressed by −1.78±0.82D vs −1.63±0.82D (p=0.121) or 1.08±0.34 mm vs 0.96±0.14 mm (p=0.010). Incident myopia at 2 years was 42.6% in placebo and 44.8% in atropine 0.01% treated eyes (p=0.896). In the low-myopia group, placebo versus atropine treated eyes progressed by −1.65±0.15D vs −1.23±0.15D (p=0.066) or 0.86±0.07 mm vs 0.68±0.05 mm (p=0.062) at 2 years. There was no difference in near acuity, glare (2.7%) or allergy (6.0%) between treatment groups. Conclusions Although there were no significant differences in myopia progression between atropine and placebo treated eyes, there were trends towards less myopic shift in atropine-treated eyes in premyopic eyes which remained emmetropic and in eyes with low myopia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: