Analyzes the subject formation of a Filipino gay professor, highlighting personal influences and societal power dynamics.
While current studies utilizing Foucault's concept of subject formation convincingly explain how macro-level forces such as neoliberal ideologies and school policies shape individuals, finer attention to the meaning-making and life influences of the subjects themselves is equally important to nuance our understanding of how capillary power operates. Focusing on a single case, this study examines the subject formation of a Filipino gay professor. Using narrative analysis, the study identifies three themes supported by six vignettes. The findings reveal compelling stories of how a gay professor was shaped by the mentoring of his gay "parlorista" uncles, only to paradoxically become their exact opposite. Concepts such as dichotomization, discourses on being a distinguished gay professor, power relations, and governmentalization are analyzed to highlight the complex negotiations through which the gay professor's subjectivity is constituted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Eduard L. Labayandoy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: