Qualitative study explores healing after CSA in families, indicating CACs can enhance care and recovery.
Children who experience childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and their non-offending family members are frequently referred to Children’s Advocacy Centers (CACs) for multisector service coordination and evidence-based treatments. Little is known about how interactions with the CAC model impact healing after CSA from a socioecological context (child, parent/caregiver, family). This qualitative study explored facilitators and barriers to healing after CSA within a socioecological context among families that received care at an urban Midwestern CAC. Semi-structured interviews (n = 15) were conducted with parents of children who experienced CSA and received services at the CCAC. Data was analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six phase method of thematic analysis and a family-centered adaptation of the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework. Findings reflected three main themes: healing, facilitators and barriers, and opportunities for CACs to promote healing after CSA. In conclusion, CAC-based interventions that incorporate a socioecological approach and community-engaged perspectives may reduce barriers to care and promote healing after CSA for children, parents, and families.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westphaln et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: