Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental investigation shows enhanced seismic resilience in metakaolin-based concrete joints, indicating sustainable building solutions.
This study experimentally investigates the cyclic performance of beam-column joints fabricated with conventional reinforced concrete, a metakaolin-modified alkali-activated concrete (AAC-15MK, with 15% metakaolin as partial cement replacement), and a 100% metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete (GPC-100MK). The primary objective is to assess the influence of binder composition and three distinct anchorage systems (Type A: 90° hooks, Type B: straight bars, Type C: cross bars) on seismic resilience. Specimens were subjected to constant axial load and reversed cyclic lateral loading. Results indicate that both AAC-15MK and GPC-100MK joints exhibited enhanced energy dissipation and ductility compared to conventional RC joints. Specifically, the GPC-100MK mix demonstrated superior initial cracking resistance and ultimate load capacity. In contrast, the AAC-15MK mix, while showing slightly lower peak loads than GPC-100MK, achieved considerable deformation capacity and substantial cumulative energy dissipation, evidenced by broader hysteretic loops. Anchorage systems incorporating 90° hooks (Type A) and particularly cross bars (Type C) demonstrated superior performance over straight bars (Type B), with Type C significantly reducing bond-slip issues and enhancing cyclic stability. These findings suggest that appropriately designed metakaolin-based binder systems, considering both material composition and detailing, offer promising sustainable alternatives for structures in seismic zones, potentially reducing CO₂ emissions while achieving robust structural performance. • Metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete (GPC) beam-column joints demonstrate superior seismic resilience compared to conventional reinforced concrete (RC) counterparts. • Full metakaolin replacement (GPC-100MK) significantly enhances ultimate load capacity, ductility, and energy dissipation in beam-column joints under cyclic loading. • Cross-bar anchorage detailing (Type C) provides optimal seismic performance, substantially reducing bond-slip and improving cyclic stability in metakaolin-based concrete joints. • Partial metakaolin replacement (AAC-15MK) yields improved seismic characteristics over RC joints, presenting a viable intermediate binder system. • Binder composition and reinforcement anchorage detailing critically influence the hysteretic behavior and failure modes of beam-column joints, with GPC and cross-bar systems offering enhanced damage tolerance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: