Key result
Early-life institutional care is linked to increased arterial stiffness, higher CRP, and lower autonomic function.
Why the study?
Does early-life adversity (institutional care) increase the risk of poor cardiometabolic health markers in adolescence?
Cross-Sectional (n=190)
No
Does early-life adversity (institutional care) increase the risk of poor cardiometabolic health markers in adolescence?
Early-life adversity limited to the first few years of life is associated with increased surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk, such as arterial stiffness and inflammation, during adolescence.
Early institutional care was associated with adverse adolescent cardiometabolic markers; leaves open whether differences predict events or warrant targeted screening.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiometabolic disease may have roots in early-life adversity (ELA). Most studies linking harsh conditions in the first year of life are either retrospective or follow individuals who continue to live in harsh conditions. The present study identified the impact of ELA, operationalized as institutional care limited to infancy and early childhood, on cardiometabolic health in adolescence. METHOD: Participants were 190 youth aged 12-21, half adopted internationally from institutional care (previously institutionalized [PI]) into highly resourced homes and a comparison group of youth born into similarly resourced homes (birth-reared; BR). A comprehensive cardiometabolic health examination in-person included a fasted blood draw to measure insulin and lipids, a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, and vascular biomarkers assessment. RESULTS: PI adolescents had higher aortic augmentation index (AIx; indexing arterial stiffness) and C-reactive protein levels and lower low-frequency to high-frequency (LF/HF) heart rate variability ratios compared with BR youth. PI youth had higher trunk tissue fat, though this was no longer significant after statistical correction. Post hoc analyses revealed significant interactions between groups and sex for body mass index (BMI) percentile and pulse wave velocity (PWV); PI boys had higher BMI percentiles than BR boys, and PI girls had higher PWV than BR girls. Only the PWV interaction remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ELA may play increase the risk of future cardiometabolic health, especially related to inflammation and arterial stiffness, reinforcing the need for timely interventions during this sensitive developmental stage. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reid et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Early-life adversity (Cardiometabolic risk) (n=190). Early-life adversity (institutional care) vs. Birth-reared in similarly resourced homes was evaluated on Cardiometabolic risk markers (aortic augmentation index [AIx], C-reactive protein [CRP], low-frequency to high-frequency [LF/HF] heart rate variability ratio). Adolescents exposed to early-life adversity via institutional care had higher arterial stiffness and C-reactive protein levels, and lower LF/HF heart rate variability ratios than birth-reared peers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: