Demonstrates that slower computerized vergence therapy significantly improves outcomes in a controlled population, suggesting optimal training strategies.
Key Points
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of computerized vergence therapy and compare the impact of different training speeds.
Participants included 12 subjects split into two training velocity groups and a control group.
One group received slow vergence training at 0.75 Δ/s, while another received fast training at 5.00 Δ/s.
Therapy lasted 80 minutes over 4 weeks, with all activities monitored and evaluations double masked.
Subjects using slow training rates showed significant increases in positive vergence ranges.
Subjects using fast training rates did not exhibit significant improvements.