ABSTRACT This paper examines the values held by experts involved in responding to myrtle rust, a major plant disease in Aotearoa New Zealand. Although values are central to biosecurity decision‐making, they are often left implicit, risking weaker decisions and reduced engagement from participants. Drawing on interviews with key experts in government and research agencies, the paper reveals clear and varied value priorities, privileging cultural and environmental concerns. The findings highlight the need for values‐focused deliberation within biosecurity planning. Purposeful and ongoing engagement and communication about the values underpinning decision‐making can strengthen internal alignment among key actors and improve future biosecurity responses.
Berry et al. (Sun,) studied this question.