PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Alzheimer s Research & Therapy3 citationsOpen Access

Real-world implementation of lecanemab and donanemab in an Italian memory center: a 1-year experience

FAFederica AgostaGCGiordano CecchettiESEdoardo G. Spinelli

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the real-world implementation of lecanemab and donanemab for early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease.
  • Conducted a prospective observational cohort study in a memory center
  • Administered 29 treatment courses of lecanemab and donanemab
  • Monitored safety through MRI for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities
  • Tracked plasma biomarkers and cognitive measures at baseline and follow-up
  • Utilized parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for data analysis
  • ARIA were infrequent, with 10% of donanemab patients experiencing mildly symptomatic ARIA-E
  • Amyloid burden decreased significantly, with a mean change of -52.4 Centiloids
  • 75% of donanemab patients reached PET negativity, whereas 0% of lecanemab patients did
  • 21% of treatment courses resulted in manageable infusion-related reactions
  • No significant change in cognitive measures over follow-up

Abstract

Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies are entering clinical practice for early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but European real-world data on feasibility, safety, and biomarker monitoring remain limited. We report the first year of implementation of lecanemab and donanemab in an Italian tertiary memory center. We conducted a prospective observational real-world cohort study at the Center for Alzheimer’s and Related Diseases of IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (Milan, Italy). Twenty-nine treatment courses were administered in patients with early symptomatic AD (lecanemab, n = 9; donanemab, n = 20) under European Medicines Agency–aligned safety monitoring and risk-mitigation protocols. Given the unbalanced treatment groups, results are descriptive and not intended for direct comparison between treatments. Safety surveillance included serial magnetic resonance imaging for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and systematic recording of infusion-related reactions. Biological monitoring included amyloid positron emission tomography with Centiloid quantification and plasma biomarkers (phosphorylated tau 181 and 217, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light chain, and amyloid-β 42/40 ratio) at baseline and follow-up. Baseline comparisons and longitudinal changes were assessed using appropriate parametric or nonparametric statistical methods. ARIA were infrequent. In donanemab-treated patients, mildly symptomatic ARIA-E occurred in 10% (2/20) and asymptomatic ARIA-H in 15% (3/20). In lecanemab-treated patients, asymptomatic ARIA-H occurred in 11% (1/9). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 21% (6/29) of treatment courses and were manageable with standardized premedication. Among 11 patients with six-month follow-up, amyloid burden decreased significantly (mean change − 52.4 Centiloids), and 75% of donanemab-treated patients (6/8) and 0% of lecanemab-treated patients reached amyloid positron emission tomography negativity (< 11CL). Plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and glial fibrillary acidic protein showed directional declines, consistent with expected biomarker trajectories under anti-amyloid therapy, while cognitive measures showed no significant change. In a structured multidisciplinary framework, lecanemab and donanemab were feasibly implemented with a preliminary favorable early safety profile, substantial amyloid reduction, and measurable plasma biomarker changes in routine practice. This experience supports the feasibility of structured real-world pathways for deployment and monitoring of disease-modifying therapies in European memory clinics, within the limitations of a small cohort and short follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Agosta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be354a6e48c4981c6736achttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-026-02015-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper