Evaluates alternative protein sources for Nile tilapia growth and bioactivity, suggesting eco-friendly options.
The demand for fishmeal is increasing, but its supply is stagnating or even declining. There is an urgent need to find an eco-friendly and cost-effective alternative protein source. This study evaluated poultry by-product and insect meal as alternatives to fishmeal for the health performance and bioactivity of Nile tilapia. A Nile tilapia fry was divided into four groups with three replicates (No = 168). The first group was fed a basal diet containing 20% fishmeal (T FM ). The second, third, and fourth groups received a basal diet where the fishmeal was substituted with poultry by-product meal (T PM ), insect meal from Hermetia illucens (T IM ), and a mixture of poultry by-product and insect meal (T MIX ), respectively. The overall growth performance data indicated that T FM and T IM significantly achieved the highest growth rates and feed utilization ( P < 0.05). The T IM diet significantly exhibited the highest total phenolic content, and both T IM and T FM showed superior antioxidant activity in fish muscle. There were no abnormal hematological or serum biochemical parameters observed in Nile tilapia fed insect meal and/or poultry by-product. The fish fillet samples from all groups were microbiologically safe for human consumption. Fish fed T IM displayed the lowest levels of TNF-α and the highest levels of IL-10 ( P < 0.05). All the groups exhibited normal architecture of the internal organs. The significantly highest recorded absorption surface area was found in both T FM and T IM diets ( P < 0.05). The NF-κB immunostaining showed no significant changes among experimental groups ( P > 0.05). Based on this study, it can be suggested that the insect meal can be a sustainable and cost-effective substitute for conventional fishmeal in aquaculture feed formulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aref et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: