PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Diagnosis0 citations

Potential missed diagnostic opportunities after low dose CT screening for lung cancer: results from the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial

View Full Paper
AHAhmed HassoonJohns Hopkins UniversitySHSarah HussainJohns Hopkins UniversityPGPanagis GaliatsatosJohns Hopkins University

Key Points

  • Assess diagnostic uncertainty following positive low-dose CT screenings for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial.
  • Secondary analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) data
  • Focused on screen-detected lung cancer cases in the LDCT arm
  • Defined potential missed diagnostic opportunity (PMDO) as lack of diagnosis after a positive CT followed by another positive CT leading to lung cancer
  • Of 1,089 lung cancers diagnosed in the LDCT arm, 630 (58%) were at risk for a PMDO
  • 37.3% of those experienced at least one PMDO
  • Only 1.7% received a diagnostic resection or biopsy after initial positive CT
  • 35.7% had little to no diagnostic procedures following the first positive CT
  • Patients with PMDO tended to have earlier stage lung cancer and longer survival rates compared to those without PMDO

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Low-dose CT (LDCT) screening is critical for early lung cancer detection. We assessed diagnostic uncertainty following positive LDCTs in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). We defined this pathway as an “Potential missed diagnostic opportunity” for participants eventually diagnosed with lung cancer. Methods This is a secondary analysis of the NLST trial, examining potential missed diagnostic opportunity among screen-detected participants who were diagnosed with lung cancer in the LDCT arm. Potential missed diagnostic opportunity (PMDO) defined as no lung cancer diagnosis following a positive LDCT, which was then followed by a subsequent annual positive LDCT that did lead to lung cancer diagnosis. Results Of 1,089 lung cancers diagnosed in the LDCT arm, 58 % (630 individuals) were adherent screen-detected at risk for a PMDO (605 55 % using Lung-RADS). Overall, 37.3 % (235 of 630) experienced ≥1 PMDO (33.1 % using Lung-RADS). Among the 235 participants who experienced a PMDO , only 1.7 % (four individuals) received a diagnostic resection or biopsy, and 35.7 % (84 individuals) had little to no diagnostic procedures following their first positive LDCT. Once diagnosed, the group that experienced PMDO tended to have earlier stage lung cancer and longer survival rates compared to those without such events. Conclusions While LDCT is a vital screening tool, a substantial proportion of lung cancer patients experience a period of diagnostic uncertainty after an initial positive screen. This pathway highlights a critical area for process improvement. Understanding the clinical decision-making during these periods is essential to fully optimize the benefits of early detection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hassoon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be356f6e48c4981c673a2bhttps://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0074
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The National Lung Screening Trial: Overview and Study Design2010 · 1,287 citations
  2. 2Cancer statistics, 20232023 · 16,971 citations
  3. 3Karl Pearson and the Chi-Squared Test1983 · 671 citations
  4. 4Cancer statistics for African American/Black People 20222022 · 594 citations
  5. 5A wilcoxon‐type test for trend1985 · 1,932 citations