Key result
ST-segment elevation in acute pericarditis is linked to ~82% higher odds of myocardial involvement.
Why the study?
Does ST-segment elevation on ECG predict myocardial involvement in patients with acute pericarditis?
Observational (n=351)
Yes
Does ST-segment elevation on ECG predict myocardial involvement in patients with acute pericarditis?
Odds Ratio: 1.82 (95% CI 1.07–3.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 26.4% vs 16.5%
p-value: p=0.035
ST-segment elevation in acute pericarditis is associated with a nearly twofold increased odds of myocardial involvement, identifying a subgroup of patients with lower remission rates and higher hospitalisation needs.
ST-segment elevation may signal myocardial involvement in acute pericarditis; this observational link leaves open whether ECG findings should guide testing or therapy.
BACKGROUND: Pericardium is considered electrically inert, but diffuse ST-elevation is an electrocardiographic marker of acute pericarditis. We hypothesised that ST-elevation in acute pericarditis may reflect underlying myocardial involvement. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the association between ST-elevation and myocardial involvement in pericarditis patients and to further characterise the clinical features and long-term outcomes of myopericarditis compared with isolated pericarditis. METHODS: This longitudinal multicentre study included 351 pericarditis patients (328 recurrent; 180 females), 70/351 with myopericarditis, defined by troponin elevation and/or suggestive cardiac MRI. RESULTS: 121 patients had ST-elevation (34.5%); they were younger: 38 years (23-53) vs 47 (31-58) (median (IQR)) (p<0.001), more often male: 63.6% (77/121) vs 40.9% (94/230) (p<0.001) and had higher C reactive protein values: 92.0 (35-170) vs 58.4 mg/L (15.8-137.5) (median (IQR)) (p=0.002) and less frequent pericardial effusions: 71.1% (86/121) vs 83.5% (192/230) (p=0.004).Myocardial involvement was diagnosed in 70/351 (19.9%) patients, occurring more frequently among those with ST-elevation: 26.4% (32/121), compared with those without: 16.5% (38/230) (p=0.035). ST-elevation predicted myocardial involvement with an OR of 1.82 (95% CI 1.07 to 3.10). Compared with isolated pericarditis, patients with myopericarditis were more frequently male: 61.4% (43/70) vs 45.6% (128/281) (p=0.023) and had a higher prevalence of transient systolic dysfunction: 13.5% (7/52) vs 2.1% (3/141) (p=0.004). During follow-up, myopericarditis patients had a lower remission rate: 18.5% (12/65) vs 31.2% (82/263) (p=0.047) and a higher annual hospitalisation rate (median 0.5 vs 0.4/year, p=0.010), while recurrence rates and disease duration were similar. Treatment strategies, including use of corticosteroids and interleukin 1 blockers, were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: ST-segment elevation in acute pericarditis was associated with myocardial involvement, supporting the concept that the pericardium is electrically inert. Myopericarditis was associated with lower remission rates and slightly higher hospitalisation needs compared to isolated pericarditis, despite otherwise comparable recurrence rates and treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceriani et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute and recurrent pericarditis (n=351). ST-segment elevation vs. No ST-segment elevation was evaluated on Myocardial involvement (defined by troponin elevation and/or suggestive cardiac MRI) (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.10, p=0.035). ST-segment elevation in acute pericarditis was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of myocardial involvement compared to patients without ST-elevation (26.4% vs 16.5%; OR 1.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: