PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Urogynecology0 citations

A Cognitive Task Analysis of How to Teach the Retropubic Midurethral Sling Surgery

View Full Paper
MAMary F. AckenbomAKAnushka KangaSKSaivagmita Kantheti

Key Points

  • This study aims to catalog the teaching techniques used by expert surgeons for retropubic midurethral sling surgery.
  • Conducted semistructured cognitive task analysis interviews with 11 surgeons.
  • Surgeons described their step-by-step teaching processes during the procedure.
  • Some surgeons reviewed intraoperative videos of their instruction to enhance understanding.
  • Data were extracted and categorized into teaching steps by multiple researchers until consensus was reached.
  • Generated 458 specific teaching microsteps for the RP-MUS surgery.
  • Identified categories for teaching steps: technical advice, demonstrations, complication instruction, ergonomic guidance, and safety optimization.
  • Strategies focused on overcoming cognitive challenges associated with the blind retropubic space.

Abstract

Importance The retropubic midurethral sling (RP-MUS) surgery poses unique training challenges due to blind trocar passage through a complex retropubic space near critical structures. A structured understanding of how experts teach these high-risk steps is essential to improve trainee learning and support safe surgical performance. Objective The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive catalog of teaching techniques to lead novice surgeons through RP-MUS surgery. Study Design Semistructured cognitive task analysis (CTA) interviews were conducted with 11 surgeons from diverse institutions who teach the RP-MUS surgical procedure. Surgeons described their step-by-step teaching process; 4 also reviewed intraoperative videos of themselves instructing trainees. All teaching steps were extracted and mapped to operative CTA steps. Inquiry focused on strategies to help trainees visualize the retropubic space, orient instruments, and optimize ergonomics. Two researchers independently extracted data; 6 researchers iteratively analyzed findings until consensus and thematic saturation was achieved. Results This CTA generated 458 teaching microsteps. Categories of teaching steps identified include the following: (1) technical advice, (2) demonstrations outside the surgical field, (3) instruction on how technique changes may cause complications, (4) ergonomic guidance, and (5) high-value assist steps that optimize safety. Many strategies specifically addressed cognitive challenges, including conceptualization of the blind retropubic space. Conclusion This study presents an innovative application of CTA to systematically characterize how experts teach the RP-MUS surgical procedure. These findings provide a foundation for iterative refinement of teaching practices and future studies linking specific instructional strategies to trainee performance, teacher confidence, and patient safety.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ackenbom et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be35836e48c4981c673ddbhttps://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001831
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper