Key result
HyperDoppler establishes reproducible reference values for normal left ventricular flow dynamics, including ~25% vortex area.
Why the study?
HyperDoppler was introduced for clinical LV flow dynamics evaluation, but quantitative information derived from its use was limited.
Observational (n=467)
Yes
The study establishes normative reference values for left ventricular flow dynamics using the reproducible, non-invasive HyperDoppler technique, laying the groundwork for identifying pathological flow alterations in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Normative HyperDoppler values for left ventricular flow are now available; supports research into pathological alterations but should not yet change practice.
STRUCTURED ABSTRACT Background Recently, HyperDoppler, a color Doppler-based ultrasound technique, has been introduced for left ventricular (LV) flow dynamics evaluation in clinical settings, but quantitative information derived from its use are limited. We aimed at establishing reference values and reproducibility of key HyperDoppler LV flow dynamics measures: vortex area, length, depth, intensity, and global kinetic energy dissipation (gKED) in normal subjects. We also explored the influence of physiological and echocardiographic variables on HyperDoppler measures. Methods This multicenter, international study involved 13 echocardiographic laboratories and an independent echo corelab. A total of 467 normal subjects were enrolled and categorized by gender and age (20–39, 40–59, and 60–79 years): of these, 317 subjects were analyzed at the corelab and 419 on-site using different color Doppler cineloops. Results Corelab analysis yielded a median value (25th–75th percentiles) of 25.0% (21.1–28.0%) for vortex area, 57.4% (53.3–62.6%) for vortex length, 34.3% (30.7–38.1%) for vortex depth, -31.9% (-28.0% to -35.8%) for vortex intensity, and 0.55 (0.44–0.70) for gKED. Minor age- and gender-related variations were noted in vortex length, depth, and gKED. Excellent reproducibility was shown for each HyperDoppler measure. Physiological behavior of left intraventricular flow dynamics was adequately captured by the HyperDoppler quantitative measures. Conclusions Reference values for left intraventricular flow dynamics were established using the HyperDoppler technique, which is reproducible and enables the assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics in clinical practice.
Beccari et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy subjects (n=467). HyperDoppler technique was evaluated on Reference values for key HyperDoppler left ventricular flow dynamics measures (vortex area, length, depth, intensity, and global kinetic energy dissipation). The non-contrast HyperDoppler technique demonstrated excellent reproducibility and established reference values for normal left intraventricular flow dynamics, including a median vortex area of 25.0% and global kinetic energy dissipation of 0.55.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: