This research reveals the production dynamics of superoxide in corals, indicating its role in growth and health.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide, are central molecules in eukaryotic growth, function, and immunity. While some corals have been associated with high extracellular superoxide concentrations, such as Porites species, we lack a clear understanding of superoxide production dynamics and purpose. Here, we combine extracellular superoxide concentration and decay rate measurements across life stages with bioinformatics to better constrain the controls and mechanisms underlying ROS formation by Porites species. Consistent with previous studies, we find that extracellular superoxide concentrations are significantly higher for Porites species compared to other coral species. We further find that superoxide decay rates are not significantly different across species, indicating that changes in production rather than decay control steady-state concentrations. Extracellular superoxide is produced by Porites astreoides across life stages from larval to newly settled polyps to adult colonies. Our bioinformatic analysis reveals that Porites lobata has genes that encode for two types of NADPH oxidase (NOX), enzymes that produce exclusively extracellular superoxide. In fact, we find widespread presence of NOX genes within genomes across scleractinian species despite species-specific variation in superoxide production. Together, these findings indicate that corals regulate extracellular superoxide and point to an important role for extracellular superoxide in coral physiology, such as cell signaling, cell differentiation, and growth regulation. These findings add to a growing appreciation for the beneficial role of ROS in marine organisms and provide a foundation to investigate the role of ROS in coral physiology, contributing to insights on coral health that can inform coral restoration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grabb et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: