Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved gas-liquid mixing using sinusoidal pulsed blowing in molten smelting, suggesting effective mixing strategies.
To overcome the limited mixing efficiency associated with conventional steady-state side blowing in molten pool smelting, this study proposes a gas injection strategy that combines a swirl lance configuration with sinusoidal pulsed blowing. Using a volume-of-fluid (VOF) multiphase flow framework coupled with the Realizable k–ε turbulence model, the performance of constant-velocity blowing is systematically compared with sinusoidal pulsed blowing over a range of amplitudes (5, 10, and 15 m/s) and frequencies (0.5, 1, and 2 Hz). The results demonstrate that sinusoidal pulsed blowing markedly enhances gas–liquid mixing within the melt pool relative to constant-speed injection. Mixing efficiency increases with blowing amplitude, while its dependence on pulse frequency is nonlinear. Within the investigated parameter space, the optimal configuration, an amplitude of 15 m/s and a frequency of 1 Hz, raises the average gas volume fraction by 8%, reduces the mixing dead-zone area by 81%, and expands the active mixing region by 25%. Overall, the imposed sinusoidal pulsing promotes bubble breakup beneath the free surface, leading to more complete bubble collapse, intensified turbulent agitation, and, ultimately, improved gas–liquid mixing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YANG et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: