PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Journal of Academic Ethics2 citationsOpen Access

Higher Education Practitioners and Their Professional Ethics: A Qualitative Content Analysis

CSCecile SamJBJordana Simmons Berwise

Key Points

  • This research investigates how higher education professionals understand their professional ethics in relation to their institutional roles.
  • Applied qualitative content analysis to 65 ethics statements from diverse administrators
  • Utilized sensemaking theory to frame the analysis
  • Identified themes related to ethical perspectives and practices
  • Developed four main themes about professional ethics: bricolage of codes, personal identity's influence, role evolution, and ethical models.
  • Showed that administrators adapt their ethics based on personal experiences and institutional changes.

Abstract

This qualitative empirical article explores the ways that higher education professionals in the United States make sense of their professional ethics in relation to their role at the institution. It applies sensemaking theory as the theoretical framework to explore 65 professional ethics statements from a wide range of administrators with differing experiences and disciplines. Using qualitative content analysis as the methodology, this study developed four themes related to how administrators make sense of their professional ethics. Those themes include creating a bricolage of different codes of ethics, incorporating personal identity and experience, evolving with their respective roles, and finding ethical models and foils.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be35ba6e48c4981c674313https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09731-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper