Key result
Anterior mitral valve prolapse linked to ~70% higher mortality vs. bileaflet prolapse under age 65.
Why the study?
What are the long-term clinical outcomes and independent predictors of mortality in patients <65 years of age with mitral valve prolapse?
Cohort (n=4,405)
Yes
What are the long-term clinical outcomes and independent predictors of mortality in patients <65 years of age with mitral valve prolapse?
In younger patients (<65 years) with mitral valve prolapse, age and prolapse subtype strongly impact clinical profile, with anterior MVP, increased PASP, elevated relative wall thickness, and mitral annular calcification independently predicting increased long-term mortality.
Background Patients with mitral valves prolapse have a heterogeneous course, and long‐term outcomes among those <65 years of age are unclear. Methods Patients <65 years of age with echocardiographic evidence of MVP at a multihospital academic health system between 2010 and 2024 were evaluated, and all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization for heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/sudden cardiac arrest) were ascertained using multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling and competing risk analysis. Results The study population comprised 4405 patients with MVP (mean age 49±13 years, 16% <35 years of age, 23% 35–50 years of age, 40% men, 92% White) with anterior MVP versus posterior MVP versus bileaflet MVP noted in 34% versus 33% versus 33%, respectively, whereas 16% had moderate or greater mitral regurgitation. Over a median follow‐up of 7.8±4 years, 313 patients (7%) died, whereas 11% experienced cardiovascular hospitalization (heart failure: 6.5%, atrial fibrillation: 4%, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/sudden cardiac arrest: 1.4%). Defibrillator implantation was performed in 24 (0.5%), whereas 55 (1.2%) patients underwent surgical mitral valve replacement/repair. Presence of anterior MVP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.2–2.4]; P =0.003), mitral annular calcification (HR, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.4–3.2]; P <0.001), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.02–1.03]; P <0.001), and relative wall thickness (HR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.2–18]; P =0.022) were independent predictors of mortality. Cardiovascular hospitalization was associated significantly with mitral regurgitation severity (HR increase, 1.1–6.7) and presence of left atrial enlargement (HR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.03–1.9]; P =0.03). Conclusions In a large contemporary real‐world cohort of patients <65 years of age with MVP, the clinical and echocardiographic profile varies by age at presentation and MVP subtype with appreciable morbidity and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhonsale et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) (n=4,405). Anterior mitral valve prolapse (aMVP) vs. Bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (bMVP) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p=0.003). Anterior mitral valve prolapse was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.7) compared to bileaflet prolapse in patients under 65 years of age.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on EchocardiographyMore from Journal of the American Heart Association