PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Migration Studies2 citations

Mobile temporalities and political possibilities: Expanding the temporal turn in migration studies

View Full Paper
AMAnne McNevinNLNoora LoriLLLoren B. Landau

Key Points

  • This research aims to expand the understanding of temporalities in migration, challenging linear citizenship narratives.
  • Engages multiple disciplines including politics, sociology, geography, and anthropology.
  • Theorizes ideas like 'radical incompletion' and examines diverse mobility scenarios.
  • Analyzes various case studies, including refugees and indigenous perspectives on time.
  • Highlights how mobile temporalities disrupt traditional timelines and enhance political possibilities.
  • Demonstrates the role of non-state regulatory powers affecting migrants' lives.
  • Reveals complex relationships between waiting, anticipation, and political autonomy.

Abstract

Abstract This special issue advances a research agenda on mobile temporalities—the multiple, dynamic temporal orders that intersect with human mobility to shape political life. While the “temporal turn” in Migration Studies has illuminated the governance of migrants through time (waiting, delay, acceleration), we argue that it remains constrained by a linear, incorporative orientation that centers citizenship as the teleological endpoint. We propose a shift from counting time to interrogating temporalities as socially and politically constructed phenomena that collide with movements such as migration, displacement, pilgrimage, and urban circulation. This reframing foregrounds regulatory powers beyond the state, migrants’ temporal agency, and non-linear horizons where waiting, anticipation, or rupture may generate politics irreducible to progress towards membership rights. Convening scholars from politics, sociology, geography, and anthropology, the issue stages a collaborative cross-disciplinary conversation. Little and Nakata theorize “radical incompletion,” bringing indigenous temporalities into debates on borders and sovereignty. Franck and Turner juxtapose refugees and “preppers” to show how anticipatory futures organize (im)mobility. Walker analyzes the time of pilgrimage, highlighting frictions with state time. Kim traces intersecting temporalities of asylum law, Chinese capitalism, and Korean evangelicalism to complicate assumptions about conversion, authenticity, and citizenship as endpoints. Across these studies, we show how mobile temporalities unsettle hegemonic timelines and open political possibilities—from new solidarities to forms of autonomy, refusal or resignation —often missed by linear frames. We invite scholars of migration and time to rethink how time moves through migration and how migration reshapes time, expanding the field’s empirical and normative horizons.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McNevin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be35f96e48c4981c6747d6https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnag009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Learning to read the signs: law in an Indigenous reality2010 · 77 citations
  2. 2Waiting and the Temporalities of Irregular Migration2020 · 288 citations
  3. 3Refuge beyond Reach2019 · 328 citations
  4. 4The Fight For Time2019 · 51 citations
  5. 5Luxury limbo: temporal techniques of border control and the humanitarianisation of waiting2018 · 86 citations