PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026The Korean Academic Association of Business Administration

Structural Risks and Management Priorities in the Korean Solar Energy Supply Chain: An Analysis Based on FGI and an L-I-C Risk Index

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SKSeungchul Kim

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This analysis identifies critical risks in the Korean solar energy supply chain, suggesting priorities for effective management.

Key Points

  • The aim is to construct a risk landscape for the Korean solar energy supply chain, focusing on risk prioritization.
  • Conducted focus group interviews with 18 experts from various supply chain stages.
  • Used ISO 31000:2018 as a theoretical framework for risk management processes.
  • Identified 10 key risk codes through FGI and literature analysis, evaluating likelihood, impact, and controllability.
  • Calculated priority indices to classify risks as Critical, High, or Medium.
  • Geographic concentration of polysilicon and ingot/wafers assessed as Critical risks.
  • Lead time issues and parts replacement strategies in manufacturing deemed Critical risks.
  • Downstream risks included compensation absence for curtailment and inefficient contract structures, classified as Critical.

Cite This Study

Seungchul Kim (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be35f96e48c4981c67487fhttps://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2026.39.2.257
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share