The study demonstrates improved detection sensitivity in lateral flow immunoassays using zwitterionic-modified cellulose paper, highlighting its potential for better diagnostics.
This study achieved anti-biofouling properties for cellulose/nitrocellulose through zwitterionization, enabling more antigen to reach the detection site in lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) technology and significantly improving sensing efficiency. An epoxylated zwitterionic copolymer, poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-sulfobetaine methacrylate) (PGS), which exhibits excellent and stable anti-biofouling properties, was selected to modify the surface of cellulose paper (CP) and reveal anti-biofouling properties and biocompatibility. Through the characterization of chemical functional groups and element distribution in FT-IR and XPS analysis, the surface modification of P(GS) on the CP was proven successfully. As a result, the zwitterionization-cellulose paper (Z-CP) was more hydrophilic than CP so that the vertical climb time was sped up by an average of 35 s. Through the zwitterionic modification, it can resist on average 55% of the protein adsorption capacity. In addition, red blood cell (RBC), bacteria, and tissue cells attachment were tested, and the results showed that the Z-CP can reduce the adhesion of RBC by about 89%, the adhesion of Escherichia coli by about 77%, and the adhesion of tissue cells by about 84%. Based on the dynamic protein transportation segmentation flow test, it was proved that the modified Z-CP can improve the fluidity efficiency of protein by 6.96 times. The sensitivity results of lateral flow immunoassays showed that the detection sensitivity of Z-CP achieved 2-fold enhancement compared to the CP. In addition, in commercial nitrocellulose papers (NCP), the detection sensitivity of Z-NCP achieved 10-fold enhancement compared to the NCP in the nanogold immunoassay lateral flow sensor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: