PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency at different intervention times for zoster-related pain: A retrospective comparative study

View Full Paper
SWS-X WangZYZhaoshuang YuXYXiangshuang Yao

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency treatment administered at two different times for zoster-related pain.
  • Enrolled 69 patients with herpes zoster-related pain.
  • Divided patients into early PRF group (within 30 days) and PHN PRF group (after 30 days).
  • Evaluated treatment effectiveness using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS).
  • Both groups experienced pain reduction after pulsed radiofrequency treatment.
  • The early PRF group showed significantly greater improvement in pain relief.
  • Early PRF patients had better sleep quality and lower anxiety and depression levels compared to the PHN group.

Abstract

A BSTRACT Background: Pain is the primary symptom of herpes zoster, commonly referred to as zoster-related neuralgia. It is typically characterized by chronic and persistent pain along the distribution of unilateral peripheral nerves. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has proven to be an effective treatment for alleviating this type of pain. Currently, there is limited research on pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment for zoster-related pain based on stratification by pain duration. This retrospective study aims to compare the efficacy of PRF treatment administered at two different intervention time points for managing zoster-related pain. Methods: Sixty-nine patients suffering from HZ-related pain were enrolled in this study. Based on the timing of PRF intervention after the onset of herpes zoster, patients were divided into two groups: the early PRF group (within 30 days) and the PHN PRF group (more than 30 days). The effectiveness of PRF treatment was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Results: All participants experienced a reduction in pain intensity following PRF treatment. However, the early PRF group showed a significantly greater improvement in pain relief. Additionally, patients in the early PRF group demonstrated markedly better outcomes in sleep quality, as well as lower levels of anxiety and depression, compared to those in the PHN PRF group. Conclusion: Early PRF intervention for herpes zoster-related neuralgia provides superior pain relief and psychological recovery compared to delayed treatment in PHN patients, highlighting the importance of timely intervention in preventing disease progression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be36086e48c4981c674a2bhttps://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1005_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Neurexin 3 Regulates Synaptic Connections Between Central Amygdala Neurons and Excitable Cells of the Lateral Parabrachial Nucleus in Rats with Varicella Zoster Induced Orofacial Pain2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Predicting, Preventing, and Managing Treatment-Related Complications in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases2020 · 144 citations
  3. 3Association of the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia with early treatment intervention of herpes zoster and patient baseline characteristics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies2024 · 24 citations
  4. 4Neuropathic Pain: From Mechanisms to Treatment2020 · 1,581 citations
  5. 5Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency as a Method of Dorsal Root Ganglia Stimulation in Patients with Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review2020 · 36 citations