Numerical analyses reveal effective settlement control in embankments using squeezed branch piles over soft soils, suggesting improved designs.
Squeezed branch piles, originally developed for building and bridge foundations, have been downsized and deployed at larger pile spacing for reinforcing embankments over soft soils. However, the working mechanism of squeezed branch pile-supported embankments remains unclear. In this study, a three-dimensional numerical model of this embankment was established based on field tests. The analyses consider different pile types (squeezed branch piles and straight piles) and pile-head structures (beam-type cap and plate-type cap). These concrete components were modeled utilizing an advanced concrete model, which captures the strain-softening/hardening and yielding behavior. Simulation results show that squeezed branch piles provide better settlement control in the subsoil beneath the embankment than straight piles for the studied cases. The beam-type cap with squeezed branch piles behaves as a pile-beam foundation that reduces maximum settlement by around 38% compared to that of the plate-type cap, while the plate-type cap system functions as a composite foundation that enhances surcharge capacity by about 35–40%. The instability of the embankment is driven by tensile failure in concrete: The beam-type cap leads to a localized failure along the ground beam, and the plate-type cap system induces a progressive failure centered on the squeezed branch piles. Within the plate-type cap, the dimensions of the pile-head plate significantly influence settlement control and the stability of the embankment in soft soil.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: