PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026European Journal Of Haematology2 citations

The Role of Microenvironment in Bispecific Antibodies Treatment in Multiple Myeloma

View Full Paper
SBSerena BarachiniRCRaffaella Cassano CassanoFRFrancesca Ronca

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how the tumor microenvironment influences the effectiveness of bispecific antibody therapies in multiple myeloma.
  • Review of current literature on bispecific antibodies and multiple myeloma
  • Analysis of the tumor microenvironment's role in T-cell interaction
  • Discussion of strategies to enhance treatment efficacy
  • Tumor microenvironment components impair T-cell activation and persistence
  • Chronic CD3 stimulation leads to T-cell exhaustion
  • Emerging strategies include combination therapies and next-generation bispecific antibodies

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell malignancy that remains largely incurable despite major therapeutic advances. T‐cell‐redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cells have recently emerged as highly effective therapies in relapsed/refractory MM, inducing deep responses even in heavily pretreated patients. However, disease relapse, limited durability of response, and treatment‐related toxicities remain frequent, underscoring the need to better understand mechanisms of resistance. Accumulating evidence indicates that the tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a central role in shaping BsAb efficacy in MM. Immunosuppressive cellular components, including regulatory T‐cells, myeloid‐derived suppressor cells, and dysfunctional antigen‐presenting cells, as well as inhibitory cytokines, hypoxia, and metabolic constraints within the TME, profoundly impair T‐cell activation, expansion, and persistence following BsAb engagement. In addition, chronic CD3 stimulation within the TME may promote T‐cell exhaustion, contributing to suboptimal responses and disease progression. This review focuses on the dynamic interplay between BsAbs and the MM TME, highlighting how microenvironment‐driven immune suppression, antigen escape, and impaired T‐cell fitness influence clinical outcomes. We further discuss emerging strategies designed to overcome these barriers, including rational combination approaches, immunomodulatory agents, and next‐generation trispecific antibodies that enhance co‐stimulation or dual‐antigen targeting. Understanding and therapeutically modulating the TME represents a critical step toward improving the depth, durability, and safety of BsAb‐based therapies in MM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barachini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be361e6e48c4981c674c16https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.70168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pre-Clinical Assessment of SAR442257, a CD38/CD3xCD28 Trispecific T Cell Engager in Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma2024 · 19 citations
  2. 2The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 103,986 citations
  3. 3The Human Breast Milk Metabolome in Overweight and Obese Mothers2020 · 53 citations
  4. 4Pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with treatment-naive multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-185): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial2019 · 247 citations
  5. 5The Prognostic Role of Lactate Dehydrogenase at First Relapse of Multiple Myeloma2020 · 12 citations