Analysis reveals driving mechanisms of landscape patterns in Huangshan City, indicating ecological implications.
The spatiotemporal evolution of landscape patterns represents the most direct manifestation of land use change and remains a pivotal focus within landscape ecology research. Taking Huangshan City—a typical mountainous tourism city—as the study area, this research systematically analyzes the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms of landscape patterns over the past three decades. Based on land use data from 1992, 2002, 2012, and 2022, the study employs an integrated methodological framework including land use transition matrices, landscape pattern indices, moving window analysis, and the geographical detector (Geodetector) model, supported by ArcGIS and FRAGSTATS platforms. The results indicate that (1) during the study period, the landscape structure in Huangshan City exhibited a general trend characterized by “a stable foundation of forest land, continuous contraction of cropland, and significant expansion of construction land.” (2) From 1992 to 2012, cropland served as the primary source of transfer, mainly being converted into forest land; conversely, between 2012 and 2022, the reciprocal transformation between cropland and forest land became the dominant transition process. (3) At the landscape level, overall diversity enhanced and spatial distribution tended toward uniformity, whereas landscape fragmentation persisted in localized areas. (4) The driving force analysis revealed that “distance to the urban center” was the primary driving factor shaping landscape pattern changes, with its explanatory power continuously increasing. Furthermore, significant synergistic enhancement effects were observed between natural and socio-economic factors. These findings provide a scientific basis for ecological protection, restoration, and sustainable development strategies in Huangshan City within the context of rapid urbanization and tourism development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: