PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry4 citationsOpen Access

Cross-contamination pathways in the analysis of plastics and related chemical compounds: Good laboratory practices and tips

View Full Paper
AFAdrián Fuente-BallesterosROReem H. ObaydoSESamar H. Elagamy

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify cross-contamination pathways in the analysis of plastics and suggest preventive measures.
  • Identification of six major cross-contamination pathways in analytical workflows
  • Suggestions for good laboratory practices based on literature and experimental experience
  • Recommendation to include procedural blanks throughout the analytical process
  • Six major contamination pathways are identified: laboratory materials, environmental factors, human handling, solvents, cleaning, and instruments
  • Practical tips are provided to minimize contamination risks in trace-level workflows
  • Inclusion of procedural blanks is emphasized as crucial for detecting background contamination

Abstract

The analysis of plastics and related chemical compounds, such as plasticizers, flame retardants, and micro- or nanoplastics, often requires working at trace levels, where even minimal contamination can significantly affect results. However, many of these target analytes are also present in common laboratory materials and environments, increasing the risk of cross-contamination. We identified six major cross-contamination pathways frequently found in analytical workflows: (I) laboratory materials, (II) environmental contamination, (III) human handling and manipulation, (IV) solvents and reagents, (V) cleaning and sample preparation, and (VI) instrumental and system-related contamination. For each of these, preventive measures and good laboratory practices are suggested based on both experimental experience and examples in the literature. As a general recommendation, procedural blanks should be included throughout the analytical process, and contamination risks should be anticipated as early as the experimental design stage. This work provides a structured reference to support more reliable and reproducible data generation in the analysis of plastic-related contaminants. Researchers are further encouraged to evaluate contamination risks throughout the workflow and to report them transparently in their publications. • Six main pathways of cross-contamination in plastics analysis are identified • Practical tips are offered to prevent contamination in plastic trace-level workflows • Procedural blanks are key to detect and control background contamination • Tips and solutions are shared to improve data quality in plastic compound analysis

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fuente-Ballesteros et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be361e6e48c4981c674d7fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2026.e00304
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Errors and Mistakes to Avoid when Analyzing Raman Spectra2022 · 18 citations
  2. 2Distribution, sedimentary record, and persistence of microplastics in the Pearl River catchment, China2019 · 291 citations
  3. 3Fast identification of microplastics in complex environmental samples by a thermal degradation method2017 · 640 citations
  4. 4Levels, sources, and health risk assessment of phthalate acid esters in indoor dust of various microenvironments in university2024 · 10 citations
  5. 5Determination of phthalate esters in Chinese spirits using isotope dilution gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry2015 · 34 citations