Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study evaluates 3D TOF-MRA's utility for mapping vertebral artery anatomy in craniovertebral junction anomalies, highlighting its safety and effectiveness.
Introduction: Vertebral artery (VA) anomalies are common in craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies and pose a significant risk for iatrogenic injury during surgery. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the reference standard, it involves ionizing radiation and contrast. Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (3D TOF-MRA) is a promising noncontrast, radiation-free alternative, yet its diagnostic utility in this specific population remains inadequately validated. The study aimed to evaluate the utility of 3D TOF-MRA for characterizing VA anatomy in CVJ anomalies and to correlate findings with available CTA and operative observations. Materials and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 67 patients with CVJ anomalies. All underwent 3D TOF-MRA on 1.5T/3T scanners. Two radiologists independently analyzed VA course using a modified Sivaraju classification. Available CTA ( n = 10) and operative findings ( n = 7) were reviewed for correlation. Results: 3D TOF-MRA successfully delineated VA anatomy in all patients. Anomalous VA courses were present in 68.7% (left) and 64.2% (right) of patients, with Type 2b being most common. A highly significant association was found between atlanto-occipital assimilation and VA anomalies (100%, P < 0.001), with significant associations also for atlantoaxial dislocation ( P = 0.049) and os odontoideum ( P = 0.039). In all cases with available CTA ( n = 10) and operative correlation ( n = 7), 3D TOF-MRA findings showed 100% concordance. Conclusion: 3D TOF-MRA is a reliable, noninvasive modality for preoperative VA mapping in CVJ anomalies, demonstrating excellent diagnostic concordance with CTA and surgical findings. It offers a safe, effective alternative for preoperative planning, particularly beneficial for younger patients requiring serial imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: