Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated theorem proving uncovers limitations of existing axioms in positive implicational logic, implying a need for further exploration.
We revisit a longstanding question about the shortest single axioms for positive implicational logic. Meredith discovered several 17-symbol single axioms and asked whether shorter ones exist. Later work reduced the problem to four candidate formulas of length 15. Using the automated theorem prover Vampire, we compute saturated clause sets that yield counter models showing that three of these candidates are not single axioms. This demonstrates the effectiveness of saturation-based reasoning for such problems, which have traditionally been studied via finite model searches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fitelson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: