PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society2 citationsOpen Access

Guarding truth in an AI world: ethics for the next generation of scholarship

View Full Paper
FMFarooq Mubarak

Key Points

  • The research aims to clarify the ethical, epistemic, and systemic challenges of AI in academic environments.
  • Conceptual exploration of AI's impact on research
  • Selective review of academic and policy sources
  • Synthesis of perspectives from ethics, technology studies, and AI scholarship
  • AI tools enhance literature synthesis and data analysis, but pose risks like misattribution and data fabrication.
  • AI disrupts traditional authorship notions, raising accountability issues.
  • Urgent need for policy updates to ensure ethical AI use and access.

Abstract

Purpose In light of the limited published literature addressing the complex ethical, epistemic and systemic implications of artificial intelligence (AI) integration in research, this paper aims to build foundational conceptual frameworks that clarify these challenges. It aims to provide a comprehensive examination of the multifaceted issues involved and to propose principled strategies for responsible AI adoption that preserve scholarly integrity and foster sustainable research practices. It is hoped that this effort can start academic discussions on how AI can be used more responsibly for guarding academic integrity. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a conceptual approach to explore the ethical, epistemic and systemic impacts of AI in scholarly research. Due to the emerging nature of this field, the analysis draws on a selective review of key academic and policy sources. Synthesizing diverse perspectives from research ethics, science and technology studies and critical AI scholarship, the paper identifies core challenges and proposes strategies for responsible and equitable AI adoption. Findings While AI tools dramatically enhance literature synthesis, data analysis and academic writing, they simultaneously introduce risks such as misattribution, data fabrication and erosion of trust. AI disrupts traditional notions of authorship and originality, raising urgent questions about accountability. Without careful human oversight, it risks compromising the reliability of research. Institutions must update policies to promote ethical use and ensure fair access to AI tools. Originality/value This paper offers a timely and comprehensive synthesis of the multifaceted ethical, epistemic and systemic challenges posed by AI integration in scholarly research. The study bridges technological innovation with foundational academic values and charts a clear path for responsible AI adoption, emphasizing human oversight, transparency and equitable access. Unlike prior studies that focus narrowly on technical capabilities or isolated ethical concerns, this work situates AI within the broader cultural and institutional ecosystems, providing actionable insights for researchers, policymakers and academic leaders committed to safeguarding the integrity and future of scholarship.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Farooq Mubarak (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be36666e48c4981c67548chttps://doi.org/10.1108/jices-09-2025-0241
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool2024 · 182 citations
  2. 2The future of work of academics in the age of Artificial Intelligence: State-of-the-art and a research roadmap2024 · 35 citations
  3. 3Can we trust academic AI detective? Accuracy and limitations of AI-output detectors2025 · 20 citations
  4. 4Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals2017 · 97 citations
  5. 5ALGIARISM: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ASSISTED PLAGIARISM2023 · 7 citations